Which is more expensive, T-Cross or T-Roc?
As a new car, an entry-level T-Cross is almost £4,000 cheaper than the most affordable T-Roc. The difference isn’t quite so chasmic on the used market but whatever your budget, you’ll find T-Crosses with lower mileage, higher spec or newer plates than T-Rocs. In standard spec there is just over $10k price difference between the two with the T-Roc starting at a RRP of $40,490 (as tested with no optional extras) and the T-Cross at RRP $30,990.
Which is bigger, T-Roc T-Cross or Taigo?
They’re both attractive, there’s no doubt about that, but the Taigo has a ‘swoopier’ shape whereas the T-Cross looks boxier. The T-Cross is also slightly bigger in general, but neither of them are too big to join you on family life in an urban area. Comparing the Taigo vs. T-Cross is a tricky spot to be in – both cars are quality family vehicles with loads of appeal. The Taigo tends to be cheaper than the T-Cross, so you might be tempted by those savings, but the T-Cross does feel the more practical option.
Which is bigger, T-Cross, T-Roc or Tiguan?
The Tiguan is larger with a bigger boot, so might be suited better to families or those that need a bit of extra space. The T-Roc is more compact but still spacious, and you might be swung by the sportier feel. It’ll hit 0-62mph in 10. The Tiguan is the clear winner in terms of boot space and practicality, with its massive 652-litre space. But the T-Cross doesn’t do too badly with 385 litres. The same goes for the rest of the cabin, which, again, is more practical in the Tiguan with plenty of cubbies and a large glovebox to store.While the Audi is the quintessential German SUV, with a huge grille and plenty of sharp edges, the T-Roc is just as impressive. The VW brings similarly sharp styling, chunky grilles and intimidating stature, but it definitely feels more family focused. We think the Audi is sportier and the T-Roc more laidback.The T-Roc is slightly easier to park than the Tiguan, and slightly cheaper – although neither of these cars are among the most affordable SUVs. It still features much of the same technology and equipment, and still has plenty of space for most buyers’ needs.Volkswagen T-Roc 1. TSI 150 Life You see, comfort is something the T-Roc does better than any other small SUV, pampering its occupants to such a degree that they’ll always be reluctant to step out.
Is T-Roc better than T-Cross?
Being the larger of the two, the T-Roc is the better option if you need more bootspace, stronger engines and increased cabin room. But if size doesn’t matter to you, the smaller Polo-based T-Cross is the one for you. VW T-Cross vs T-Roc Dimensions Whereas the VW T-Roc is bigger than the T-Cross, offering a bit more space and versatility. Dimensions for the VW T-Roc are 1599 mm height, 1819 mm width and 4251 mm in length.The T-Cross gets a 385-litre boot that grows to 1,281 litres when the rear seats are folded flat, while the T-Roc has a slightly larger 445-litre boot that expands to 1,290 litres.
Is the T-Cross worth buying?
We think the T-Cross is a great buy in its cheaper forms, but if you’re looking higher up the price range, you’ll probably be better off with a VW T-Roc. Is the VW T-Cross Worth the Money? If you’re looking for a compact SUV and like the styling of the T-Cross, I wouldn’t let the above issues put you off. Overall, they’re well put-together cars, with a highly efficient and reliable engine.Is the Volkswagen T-Roc a good car? Yes, it is a good car. Our expert reviewers have given the T-Roc a score of 7/10. The Volkswagen has a big boot and drives well, but it’s uncomfortable over bumps and some alternatives are more affordable.Yes, the T-Cross is a small SUV. It’s a roomy enough for a family but compact enough for easy parking. It’s just the right size for town driving and the school run.In terms of handling, the Volkswagen T-Cross is excellent for driving around town centres thanks to its effortlessly light steering. And it doesn’t feel big despite its comparatively high riding position compared with the VW Polo on which it’s based.