What is better than a supercharger?
Turbochargers make better horsepower, but superchargers are better for low end torque. Depending on what you are trying to do, your choice might change. That said, because superchargers do depend on the running engine to operate, it’s a less efficient process than a turbocharger. They are also, on the whole, more expensive than a turbocharger, but they’re also easier to install.Adding a supercharger to an engine can greatly reduce its reliability. The added stress on the engine internals can put more wear on the engine in a shorter amount of time. However, if the engine is supercharged from the factory, it could last longer since it’s under the OEM manufacturer’s specifications.When building an engine for supercharging (other than for racing), it is generally built for low to mid-range torque and power. This is similar to a stock engine. And because a stock engine can be used with a supercharger, it would be just as easy to operate or maintain. This makes it less exotic and more practical.
Why are superchargers not used anymore?
Supercharging is less commonly used in the 21st century, as manufacturers have shifted to turbochargers to reduce fuel consumption and increase power outputs, especially with reduced engine displacements. Superchargers can be used with automatic or manual transmissions and will not increase transmission wear under normal driving. When racing, however, the additional torque provided by supercharging will place additional load on the transmission, especially when increased traction is present, such as with slicks.