Is the T-Cross worth buying?
If you’re looking for a compact SUV and like the styling of the T-Cross, I wouldn’t let the above issues put you off. Overall, they’re well put-together cars, with a highly efficient and reliable engine. With base models starting at around £25,000, it offers pretty good value compared to many other SUVs. The T-Roc is classed as a ‘small SUV’, but actually it’s a practical size – there’s room for five, and a decent-sized boot. Our test car featured a 1-litre, 3-cylinder engine with a 6-speed manual gearbox and front-wheel drive.We reckon the 1. TSI 115 Match version of the VW T-Cross offers the best value for money. It’s slightly cheaper than an entry-level Ford Puma, but there are more affordable versions of the Nissan Juke and Seat Arona available.Volkswagen T-Roc 1. TSI 150 Life You see, comfort is something the T-Roc does better than any other small SUV, pampering its occupants to such a degree that they’ll always be reluctant to step out. Elevated seats provide easy access and a great view, and finding an ideal driving position is a doddle.
Is a T-Cross bigger than at ROC?
VW T-Cross vs T-Roc Dimensions Dimensions for the VW T-Cross include 1583 mm height, 1760 mm width and 4108 mm in length. This compact length makes it agile and ideal for city driving and parking in tight spaces. Whereas the VW T-Roc is bigger than the T-Cross, offering a bit more space and versatility. Although the T-Cross is only slightly smaller than the Golf-based T-Roc, VW is marketing the T-Cross as the more practical and family-oriented car, as Volkswagen expects the T-Cross to appeal to young families and older demographics due to its tall roof and its high driving position.When comparing the BMW brand to the Volkswagen brand, BMW has the advantage in the areas of horsepower, towing capacity and variety of models offered. Volkswagen has the advantage in the areas of new car pricing, used car pricing, depreciation, fuel efficiency, overall quality, reliability, safety and retained value.Smaller engines use less fuel than larger ones and the 1. T-Cross is little and Volkswagen says over a combination of open and urban roads it uses 5. L/100km. That’s fuel efficient but these days larger SUVs with hybrid systems are achieving the same low consumption.Additionally, a used Volkswagen often retains its value well, thanks to its solid reputation. New cars tend to depreciate quickly, so purchasing a pre-owned vehicle can provide better value over time. You’ll find a wide selection of models, giving you plenty of options to find one that fits your needs and preferences.In a list of 30 popular auto brands, Volkswagen’s service costs were lower than those of 21 different brands over ten years. That means Volkswagen cars and SUVs are relatively inexpensive to maintain compared to other brands.
Which is better, T-Roc or T-Cross?
Being the larger of the two, the T-Roc is the better option if you need more bootspace, stronger engines and increased cabin room. But if size doesn’t matter to you, the smaller Polo-based T-Cross is the one for you. The T-Roc and Golf are broadly similar in size, with the Golf being slightly longer but the T-Roc being taller.
Is T-Cross better than Polo?
Where it comes into its own. You would, however, buy a T-Cross for practicality. It’s only slightly longer than the Polo but seems a lot more spacious and the rear bench can be slid backwards and forwards for more legroom or space in the boot. The T-Cross rides on the same MQB platform, uses mostly the same engines and is built in the same Spanish factory as the Polo, but is ever so slightly longer and taller. You sit 100mm higher up. Bit more practical than a Polo too, thanks to increased overall length and a sliding rear bench seat.