Is T-Roc or T-Cross bigger?
VW T-Cross vs T-Roc Dimensions Dimensions for the VW T-Cross include 1583 mm height, 1760 mm width and 4108 mm in length. This compact length makes it agile and ideal for city driving and parking in tight spaces. Whereas the VW T-Roc is bigger than the T-Cross, offering a bit more space and versatility. Although the T-Cross is only slightly smaller than the Golf-based T-Roc, VW is marketing the T-Cross as the more practical and family-oriented car, as Volkswagen expects the T-Cross to appeal to young families and older demographics due to its tall roof and its high driving position.The versatile and practical Volkswagen T-Cross is now available with a new Black Edition specification featuring black-themed exterior trim, an upgraded equipment list over the SE on which it is based, and the model’s acclaimed blend of personality, usability and style.
Which car is bigger, a T-Roc or a T-Cross?
VW T-Cross vs T-Roc Dimensions Dimensions for the VW T-Cross include 1583 mm height, 1760 mm width and 4108 mm in length. This compact length makes it agile and ideal for city driving and parking in tight spaces. Whereas the VW T-Roc is bigger than the T-Cross, offering a bit more space and versatility. Being the larger of the two, the T-Roc is the better option if you need more bootspace, stronger engines and increased cabin room. But if size doesn’t matter to you, the smaller Polo-based T-Cross is the one for you.
Which is cheaper, T-Roc or T-Cross?
As a new car, an entry-level T-Cross is almost £4,000 cheaper than the most affordable T-Roc. The difference isn’t quite so chasmic on the used market but whatever your budget, you’ll find T-Crosses with lower mileage, higher spec or newer plates than T-Rocs. No, but it’s far from the expensive end of things. Plus, if you can resist ticking some option boxes, it beats some value-focused rivals and looks good doing it. If the feeling of a sturdy fit-out and a confidence inspiring drive is important to you, I reckon the T-Roc should be an entry on your shopping list.
Which is better, Tiguan or T-Cross?
The Tiguan is the clear winner in terms of boot space and practicality, with its massive 652-litre space. But the T-Cross doesn’t do too badly with 385 litres. The same goes for the rest of the cabin, which, again, is more practical in the Tiguan with plenty of cubbies and a large glovebox to store. The T-Roc is slightly easier to park than the Tiguan, and slightly cheaper – although neither of these cars are among the most affordable SUVs. It still features much of the same technology and equipment, and still has plenty of space for most buyers’ needs.
Which VW T-Cross is best?
We reckon the 1. TSI 115 Match version of the VW T-Cross offers the best value for money. It’s slightly cheaper than an entry-level Ford Puma, but there are more affordable versions of the Nissan Juke and Seat Arona available. If you’re looking for a compact SUV and like the styling of the T-Cross, I wouldn’t let the above issues put you off. Overall, they’re well put-together cars, with a highly efficient and reliable engine. With base models starting at around £25,000, it offers pretty good value compared to many other SUVs.We reckon the 1. TSI 115 Match version of the VW T-Cross offers the best value for money. It’s slightly cheaper than an entry-level Ford Puma, but there are more affordable versions of the Nissan Juke and Seat Arona available.Volkswagen T-Roc 1. TSI 150 Life You see, comfort is something the T-Roc does better than any other small SUV, pampering its occupants to such a degree that they’ll always be reluctant to step out. Elevated seats provide easy access and a great view, and finding an ideal driving position is a doddle.We reckon the 1. TSI 115 Match version of the VW T-Cross offers the best value for money. It’s slightly cheaper than an entry-level Ford Puma, but there are more affordable versions of the Nissan Juke and Seat Arona available.