Is T-Cross bigger than Polo?
The t-cross is based on the same underpinnings as the vw polo hatchback, and isn’t much bigger in terms of its footprint. That means it has tons of similarly-sized suv alternatives – from the mechanically-related seat arona, to the sporty ford puma and the plush peugeot 2008. Being the larger of the two, the t-roc is the better option if you need more bootspace, stronger engines and increased cabin room. But if size doesn’t matter to you, the smaller polo-based t-cross is the one for you.VW T-Cross vs T-Roc Dimensions Dimensions for the VW T-Cross include 1583 mm height, 1760 mm width and 4108 mm in length. This compact length makes it agile and ideal for city driving and parking in tight spaces. Whereas the VW T-Roc is bigger than the T-Cross, offering a bit more space and versatility.We think the T-Cross is a great buy in its cheaper forms, but if you’re looking higher up the price range, you’ll probably be better off with a VW T-Roc. What is the difference between a T-Roc and a T-Cross? The VW T-Roc is bigger, better to drive and only a bit more expensive than the T-Cross.
What is the problem with the VW T-Cross engine?
VW T-Cross: 1. TSI problems with timing chain The 1. TSI engine in the Volkswagen T-Cross develops characteristic problems with the timing chain between 40,000 and 60,000 kilometers, which are manifested by metallic rattling at cold start and unsteady idling. But what is the cause of the 1. TSI problem? In this case, the culprit is the timing chain. It ensures that the camshafts are driven by the crankshaft. The chains wear out prematurely as a result of inaccurate production and residues of production dirt.