Is a VW T-Cross bigger than at ROC?
VW T-Cross vs T-Roc Dimensions Dimensions for the VW T-Cross include 1583 mm height, 1760 mm width and 4108 mm in length. This compact length makes it agile and ideal for city driving and parking in tight spaces. Whereas the VW T-Roc is bigger than the T-Cross, offering a bit more space and versatility. On the other hand, while the Golf is good around town, the T-Cross, aided by its smaller size and higher driving position, is even better. Narrow streets, car parks, you name it – the T-Cross tackles urban scenarios more easily.In terms of handling, the Volkswagen T-Cross is excellent for driving around town centres thanks to its effortlessly light steering. And it doesn’t feel big despite its comparatively high riding position compared with the VW Polo on which it’s based.
Is the T-Cross good for long journeys?
As it turned out, though, we needn’t have worried. The T-Cross is a pretty small car – only 136mm longer than a Polo – but it feels like a much larger vehicle when on the move. In fact, the near-100-mile trip to Cambridge from our home in South West London was completed in a very comfortable two hours. Where it comes into its own. You would, however, buy a T-Cross for practicality. It’s only slightly longer than the Polo but seems a lot more spacious and the rear bench can be slid backwards and forwards for more legroom or space in the boot.It’s only slightly longer than the Polo but seems a lot more spacious and the rear bench can be slid backwards and forwards for more legroom or space in the boot.You would, however, buy a T-Cross for practicality. It’s only slightly longer than the Polo but seems a lot more spacious and the rear bench can be slid backwards and forwards for more legroom or space in the boot.
Is the VW T-Cross worth buying?
Is the VW T-Cross Worth the Money? If you’re looking for a compact SUV and like the styling of the T-Cross, I wouldn’t let the above issues put you off. Overall, they’re well put-together cars, with a highly efficient and reliable engine. Design. The T-Cross is Volkswagen’s smallest SUV at 4. Polo hatchback it looks more like a mini version of the Tiguan.Is the VW T-Cross Worth the Money? If you’re looking for a compact SUV and like the styling of the T-Cross, I wouldn’t let the above issues put you off. Overall, they’re well put-together cars, with a highly efficient and reliable engine.We reckon the 1. TSI 115 Match version of the VW T-Cross offers the best value for money. It’s slightly cheaper than an entry-level Ford Puma, but there are more affordable versions of the Nissan Juke and Seat Arona available.Yes, the T-Cross is a small SUV. It’s a roomy enough for a family but compact enough for easy parking. It’s just the right size for town driving and the school run.Choosing between the Volkswagen T-Cross and Skoda Kamiq ultimately comes down to priorities and budget. The T-Cross positions itself as the more premium option, commanding higher prices but offering unique features like sliding rear seats that genuinely enhance versatility.
What’s best, T-Roc or T-Cross?
Being the larger of the two, the T-Roc is the better option if you need more bootspace, stronger engines and increased cabin room. But if size doesn’t matter to you, the smaller Polo-based T-Cross is the one for you. We think the T-Cross is a great buy in its cheaper forms, but if you’re looking higher up the price range, you’ll probably be better off with a VW T-Roc.Volkswagen T-Cross models, specs and alternatives. The Volkswagen T-Cross is yet another small SUV from the German manufacturer, slotting in just below the T-Roc and alongside the Taigo with its coupe-style roof.The Tiguan is larger with a bigger boot, so might be suited better to families or those that need a bit of extra space. The T-Roc is more compact but still spacious, and you might be swung by the sportier feel. It’ll hit 0-62mph in 10.Being the larger of the two, the T-Roc is the better option if you need more bootspace, stronger engines and increased cabin room. But if size doesn’t matter to you, the smaller Polo-based T-Cross is the one for you.
Is Tiguan better than T-Cross?
The Tiguan is the clear winner in terms of boot space and practicality, with its massive 652-litre space. But the T-Cross doesn’t do too badly with 385 litres. The same goes for the rest of the cabin, which, again, is more practical in the Tiguan with plenty of cubbies and a large glovebox to store. The Tiguan is larger with a bigger boot, so might be suited better to families or those that need a bit of extra space. The T-Roc is more compact but still spacious, and you might be swung by the sportier feel.The T-Cross vs. Tiguan is a debate many potential VW SUV buyers are having between themselves, their friends, and their families. One is bigger and has been around for a long time (Tiguan), but the other is compact, based on the Polo, and fresh to the range (T-Cross).The T-Roc is slightly easier to park than the Tiguan, and slightly cheaper – although neither of these cars are among the most affordable SUVs. It still features much of the same technology and equipment, and still has plenty of space for most buyers’ needs.The Tiguan is the clear winner in terms of boot space and practicality, with its massive 652-litre space. But the T-Cross doesn’t do too badly with 385 litres. The same goes for the rest of the cabin, which, again, is more practical in the Tiguan with plenty of cubbies and a large glovebox to store.
What is the weakness of the Tiguan?
Electrical issues: Intermittent failures with sensors, power windows, or driver-assist systems have been noted across several years. Higher-than-average maintenance costs: As a German vehicle, the Tiguan often costs more to repair and maintain compared to Japanese competitors like the Honda CR-V or Toyota RAV4. What year Volkswagen Tiguan is the most unreliable? The 2009–2011 Tiguan is generally considered the most problematic due to widespread timing chain failures and engine issues.The best Volkswagen Tiguan alternatives in 2025 are: Toyota RAV4. Skoda Kodiaq. BMW X1. Kia Sportage.