What are the disadvantages of the Polo car?
Some of the Volkswagen Polo GT’s cons are that it’s a bit more expensive than other compact cars and that it has a smaller backseat and cargo area. Additionally, the ride can be a bit jarring on rough roads. Overall, though, the Polo GT is a great choice for a small car. Polo began as a noble sport, and for centuries, it remained one. Even today, the sport conjures images of the royal family, large hats, sprawling estates, and champagne. This is in part due to the many philanthropic initiatives and galas the tournaments benefit, but also the high costs associated with playing.Democratising innovation. Each generation of the Polo has offered more space and comfort, more efficient engines and innovative safety features. New features such as front and side airbags, power steering, belt tensioners and ABS were introduced and made sure the Polo remained successful.In some ways the Polo’s engine (GTI aside) is the weakest part of the suave image the car has tried to cultivate for itself. It has sensible road manners and behaves well on the motorway, but despite VW’s best efforts to smother the engine note you still get that distinctive 3cyl thrum and eagerness to rev.The Polo is a compact car, with a traditional transversely mounted engine and front-wheel drive.The Polo’s comfortable ride and quiet cabin mean it feels like a big car on the motorway, but its small size and light controls make it easy to get the hang of if you’re a first-time driver.
Which car is better than Polo?
Our pick of the 10 best volkswagen polo alternatives are: toyota yaris. Peugeot 208. Dacia sandero. Seat ibiza. Whocanfixmycar found that when looking at the most common repair jobs, the volkswagen polo had the lowest average repair cost of £214. The ford fiesta is the second cheapest at £230. Vauxhall corsa at £238.The average price of repair requests we’ve received for a Volkswagen Polo is £791, and the most expensive Polo repair request we’ve received is £8,834.
Which Polo is fuel efficient?
However, thanks to its turbocharged 1. Polo Vivo GT boasts the lowest fuel consumption of all. In fact, its claimed figure of 4. L/100 km makes it 1 of SA’s most-efficient petrol cars . Early Polos, both with the 59bhp and 69bhp 1. The 1. TSI and 1. TSI turbocharged petrol engines in facelifted Polos are a much better bet, with average economy figures of 62.You’ll notice another 1. MPI engine has no turbocharger and it makes the Polo feel pretty sluggish above 50mph. If you mostly trundle around town it’s an okay choice, but you end up working it so hard above 50mph you can see your fuel economy drop to about 40mpg.While the former was mated to a 5-speed MT, the latter was paired to a standard 6-speed MT and an optional 6-speed AT. The fuel efficiency figures of the Polo were as follows: 1-litre MPI: 17. TSI MT: 18.Your Polo has a 45-litre fuel tank, which converts as 9. In kilometres, that leads to a figure of 726.
Which Polo is better, petrol or diesel?
Volkswagen Polo mileage starts at 16. The petrol mileage for Volkswagen Polo ranges between 16. Volkswagen Polo is 20. What is Volkswagen Polo lifespan? The estimated lifespan of a Volkswagen Polo is 155,000 miles, before reaching the life expectancy upper limit. Factors such as ULEZ compliance and BHP are major when looking into a vehicle’s lifespan/life expectancy.FAQs on Polo [2010-2012] Mileage The ARAI mileage of Volkswagen Polo [2010-2012] is 16.