The 1. TSI engines pre 2013 were the EA111 engine that had a whole host of issues, including cam chain and tensioner design as you are well aware of, but also issues with slow warm up, coil pack failure, turbo failure, blowby, high oil consumption, carbon build up and probably some other bits I forgot. TSI engines, especially in the early 1.
Is the Polo 1. TSI a good car?
Three-cylinder Volkswagen Polo supermini has impressed, but what about this 1. TSI four-cylinder? The updated VW Polo remains a fine choice, as long as you spec it with the right engine. Around town the 1. TSI is smooth and refined, but on faster roads it feels underpowered. Which Volkswagen Polo years are the best? If you’re looking to buy a VW Polo right now, then the current 2018-onward Mk6 model is probably the one you’ll want. It looks a little bit sharper than the Mk5 it replaced, both inside and out, and it also feels a wee bit sharper from behind the wheel, too.Avoid used Polos with the 1. TSI turbocharged petrol or 1. TDI diesel engines unless they have documented carbon cleaning, recent timing belt changes, and no signs of turbo lag or oil leaks.If you want a long distance polo, get the 1. TDI 3cyl, my mother has an R-Line one and regularly returns 65-80MPG and has been rock solid in her ownership. The 1. TDI is pretty solid as well (my brother has one with well over 115k miles and flies through MOTs with no fuss) but the 1. TDI drives better in my opinion.Ultimately, the choice is yours! If you want something dependable, fun, and affordable, the Polo Vivo will never let you down. But if you’re ready for something with a bit more edge, more performance, and a few extra luxuries, the Polo TSI is waiting to impress.
Is the 1. TSI engine any good?
What makes the 1. TSI so good is that the power is delivered over the entire rpm range that is normally used. You can drive quite actively without having to work with the gear lever all the time. The car feels “peppy” during city driving. It accelerates well both from a standstill and when overtaking. That 1. TSI petrol engine is also excellent, as long as you’re not doing mega-mileage. Just be careful that you buy one with a full service history and don’t forget that you can buy a Golf, Octavia or Leon that is mechanically identical for less money.The VW Polo 1. The FSI engines with direct injection (1. FSI with 86 hp) were technically interesting, but were prone to coking of the intake valves.My VW Polo 1. TDI, modded to 135hp at 285 000kms and to 208hp at 345 000kms. Passed the 406 000kms right before being crashed into. Original engine, bottom end has never been opened up, doesn’t eat any oil or coolant. Very reliable.
Which Polo TSI is best?
The 1. TSI engine arguably represents the sweet spot in terms of powertrain options (though the 1. TSI BlueMotion and 1. TSI R-Line variants are also worth a look), offering a pleasing mix of oomph and potential frugality. It’s easily the most common engine, too, which means there is plenty of choice. The Volkswagen 1. TSI CBZ engine is a compact and efficient turbocharged petrol powertrain engineered to deliver smooth performance, excellent fuel economy, and reduced emissions.