What is the boot size of the T-Cross vs T-Roc?

What is the boot size of the T-Cross vs T-Roc?

Whether you have active kids or just do large weekly food shops, both cars would be a great option for you. The T-Cross gets a 385-litre boot that grows to 1,281 litres when the rear seats are folded flat, while the T-Roc has a slightly larger 445-litre boot that expands to 1,290 litres. The Volkswagen T-Cross offers a boot space of approximately 455 litres with the seats up, which expands to about 1,281 litres with the seats down.The T-Cross gets a 385-litre boot that grows to 1,281 litres when the rear seats are folded flat, while the T-Roc has a slightly larger 445-litre boot that expands to 1,290 litres.The Volkswagen T-Cross offers a boot space of approximately 455 litres with the seats up, which expands to about 1,281 litres with the seats down.Boot space Likewise, the T-Roc’s boot is deliciously practical. At 445 litres it’s above average for the small SUV class, is a useful boxy shape and has more than enough room for a couple of suitcases or a large baby buggy.

Which is bigger, T-Cross, T-Roc or Tiguan?

The Tiguan is larger with a bigger boot, so might be suited better to families or those that need a bit of extra space. The T-Roc is more compact but still spacious, and you might be swung by the sportier feel. It’ll hit 0-62mph in 10. The Tiguan is larger with a bigger boot, so might be suited better to families or those that need a bit of extra space. The T-Roc is more compact but still spacious, and you might be swung by the sportier feel. It’ll hit 0-62mph in 10.The Tiguan is the clear winner in terms of boot space and practicality, with its massive 652-litre space. But the T-Cross doesn’t do too badly with 385 litres. The same goes for the rest of the cabin, which, again, is more practical in the Tiguan with plenty of cubbies and a large glovebox to store.VW T-Cross vs T-Roc Dimensions Dimensions for the VW T-Cross include 1583 mm height, 1760 mm width and 4108 mm in length. This compact length makes it agile and ideal for city driving and parking in tight spaces. Whereas the VW T-Roc is bigger than the T-Cross, offering a bit more space and versatility.The T-Roc is slightly easier to park than the Tiguan, and slightly cheaper – although neither of these cars are among the most affordable SUVs. It still features much of the same technology and equipment, and still has plenty of space for most buyers’ needs.Being the larger of the two, the T-Roc is the better option if you need more bootspace, stronger engines and increased cabin room. But if size doesn’t matter to you, the smaller Polo-based T-Cross is the one for you.

Is T-Roc or T-Cross better?

The bigger T-Roc has a fixed rear bench but it has more legroom and more luggage space than the T-Cross, so is a better choice for a growing family or carrying stuff. It’s worth noting that four-wheel-drive T-Rocs have 50 litres less boot space than front-drive cars, dropping to 395 litres. In terms of handling, the Volkswagen T-Cross is excellent for driving around town centres thanks to its effortlessly light steering. And it doesn’t feel big despite its comparatively high riding position compared with the VW Polo on which it’s based.Is the VW T-Cross Worth the Money? If you’re looking for a compact SUV and like the styling of the T-Cross, I wouldn’t let the above issues put you off. Overall, they’re well put-together cars, with a highly efficient and reliable engine.We reckon the 1. TSI 115 Match version of the VW T-Cross offers the best value for money. It’s slightly cheaper than an entry-level Ford Puma, but there are more affordable versions of the Nissan Juke and Seat Arona available.Although the T-Cross is only slightly smaller than the Golf-based T-Roc, VW is marketing the T-Cross as the more practical and family-oriented car, as Volkswagen expects the T-Cross to appeal to young families and older demographics due to its tall roof and its high driving position.

Is the VW T-Roc smaller than the T-Cross?

VW T-Cross vs T-Roc Dimensions Whereas the VW T-Roc is bigger than the T-Cross, offering a bit more space and versatility. Dimensions for the VW T-Roc are 1599 mm height, 1819 mm width and 4251 mm in length. While the Audi is the quintessential German SUV, with a huge grille and plenty of sharp edges, the T-Roc is just as impressive. The VW brings similarly sharp styling, chunky grilles and intimidating stature, but it definitely feels more family focused. We think the Audi is sportier and the T-Roc more laidback.The T-Roc is based on the MQB A1 platform and is closely related with the Volkswagen Golf Mk7, SEAT León Mk3, Audi A3 Mk3, and the Škoda Octavia Mk3.

What is cheaper, T-Cross or T-Roc?

In standard spec there is just over $10k price difference between the two with the T-Roc starting at a RRP of $40,490 (as tested with no optional extras) and the T-Cross at RRP $30,990. As a new car, an entry-level T-Cross is almost £4,000 cheaper than the most affordable T-Roc. The difference isn’t quite so chasmic on the used market but whatever your budget, you’ll find T-Crosses with lower mileage, higher spec or newer plates than T-Rocs.The T-Roc really does feel like a family car, big enough for five adults in terms of leg, head and shoulder space. And let’s be honest, the boot is hardly small: 445 litres is substantial by any standard and it stretches to 1290 litres with the rear seats folded flat.With removable and foldable third-row seats for extra cargo space, the Renault Triber offers a generous boot capacity of up to 625 litres¹.The T-Roc is slightly larger than the T-Cross, but in reality not by much for each exterior dimension. Even the luggage area is almost identical with the less than 10 litres difference between the two, 385 litres compared to 392 litres and next to no difference in the width and the length.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top