Which is better, a VW Polo or a Golf?
If you’re still unsure which is the best option, look at what your priorities are when it comes to a used car. If you’re looking for something that is versatile and practical, the Volkswagen Golf is a great choice. For urban driving and nimble handling, the Volkswagen Polo is an excellent option. Some of the Volkswagen Polo GT’s cons are that it’s a bit more expensive than other compact cars and that it has a smaller backseat and cargo area. Additionally, the ride can be a bit jarring on rough roads. Overall, though, the Polo GT is a great choice for a small car.The top competitors for Volkswagen Polo are Maruti Suzuki Baleno, Toyota Glanza and Maruti Suzuki Swift 2024 ranging from ₹ 6. Lakhs to ₹ 10 Lakhs.The average Polo mileage at the time of repair requests is 60,487 miles. Most motors will run smoothly between the benchmark of 50,000 – 80,000 miles [2]. The Volkswagen Polo sits in the lower half of this scale, but it’s still well above the bottom of the benchmark, which suggests that the Polo is reasonably reliable.Volkswagen Individual have also engineered an even faster Polo called the Polo GTI Cup Edition. Available with the same 1. W (180 hp), its claimed 0–100 km/h is 7.A total of 155,100 used Polo sales took place in 2023 [1], but does that mean it’s reliable? The Volkswagen Polo scored a very admirable 69 out of 100 against our criteria, which is the second highest reliability score out of all ten most popular used cars.
What’s cheaper to insure, Polo or Golf?
The Polo will be cheaper to buy than the Golf, and it’ll probably be slightly cheaper to run too. Not that most Golfs will be expensive to run, but the Polo offers some of the lowest insurance costs if you stick to the entry-level engine. Polo is good with many things. However, the rear seat in the car is not so fun to sit in. The comfort is missing, and there is a lack of legroom in the back. The car has a huge floor hump in the middle, which is quite massive, creating issues for the rear-seat passenger(s).Yes. In fact, the Polo is one of the best all-rounders in the small car class, proving good to drive, comfortable and with generous interior space. For other options see our best small cars page.Some of the Volkswagen Polo GT’s cons are that it’s a bit more expensive than other compact cars and that it has a smaller backseat and cargo area. Additionally, the ride can be a bit jarring on rough roads. Overall, though, the Polo GT is a great choice for a small car.The Volkswagen Polo is easy to drive around town thanks to its light steering and good visibility. The relatively slim pillars don’t block your view out at junctions and its large rear windscreen helps make parking a doddle, too. There aren’t many small cars out there that are comfier on the road than the Polo.The Golf’s larger engine provides a faster and comfortable driving experience, making it ideal for high-speed driving and longer journeys. The Polo, on the other hand, is better suited for city commutes and shorter journeys.
Why are golfs more expensive than polos?
Ownership costs for the Golf and Polo can vary significantly based on the specific versions you’re considering. Generally, the Polo is less expensive to purchase and run due to its smaller size and greater fuel efficiency. Insurance premiums for the Polo are also likely to be lower due to its lower insurance groupings. The Polo’s smaller size, price tag and engine size are matched by its lower insurance costs too. You can find a number of VW Polos models in insurance group one (out of 50) – making them among the cheapest cars in the UK to insure.If you’re still unsure which is the best option, look at what your priorities are when it comes to a used car. If you’re looking for something that is versatile and practical, the Volkswagen Golf is a great choice. For urban driving and nimble handling, the Volkswagen Polo is an excellent option.Our pick of the 10 best volkswagen polo alternatives are: renault clio. Skoda fabia. Toyota yaris. Peugeot 208.
Which is cheaper to insure, Polo or Golf?
The Polo will be cheaper to buy than the Golf, and it’ll probably be slightly cheaper to run too. Not that most Golfs will be expensive to run, but the Polo offers some of the lowest insurance costs if you stick to the entry-level engine. Not a huge difference here: Both are easy to park and great for urban driving. The Polo squeezes out a bit more boot capacity and room in the rear seats. When it comes to cargo specs, the Polo also just edges the A1 with 351 litres of boot space versus Audi’s 335 litres – handy if you’re regularly hauling gear.The Golf’s dimensions generally afford more interior space and a larger cargo area, scoring it higher on the practicality scale. In contrast, the Polo’s smaller footprint gives it an advantage in urban environments where parking and manoeuvrability are paramount.
Is Golf or Polo better?
If you have a family then we’d recommend the Golf because it’s that little bit bigger, so it has a larger boot, more rear legroom and headroom. We’d suggest opting for the Polo if you’re someone who likes to nip down a British B-road, because its narrow body is great for that. Polo: styling. They may share the same parent company (the Volkswagen Audi Group) and the same platform, but they don’t look exactly the same by any stretch. The Audi A1 does have a much more aggressive look to it thanks to its angular headlights and slight gap where the bonnet meets the front of the car.Build quality is equally strong in both brands, although Audi tends to cover more of the surfaces in premium materials – as you’d hope, given its upmarket positioning.Which Volkswagen Polo years are the best? If you’re looking to buy a VW Polo right now, then the current 2018-onward Mk6 model is probably the one you’ll want. It looks a little bit sharper than the Mk5 it replaced, both inside and out, and it also feels a wee bit sharper from behind the wheel, too.