What are the disadvantages of the Polo?
Some of the volkswagen polo gt’s cons are that it’s a bit more expensive than other compact cars and that it has a smaller backseat and cargo area. Additionally, the ride can be a bit jarring on rough roads. Overall, though, the polo gt is a great choice for a small car. Verdict. The volkswagen polo generally doesn’t fare well in terms of parts prices. This is rather disappointing when one considers that the polo and many of its components are fabricated locally. The cheapest overall, in 2020, when combining all of the three sections, was the hyundai i20.Our pick of the 10 best Volkswagen Polo alternatives are: Toyota Yaris. Peugeot 208. Dacia Sandero. SEAT Ibiza.There is not much contest here as we have already established that the i20 is the hatchback to pick if you want the best features on offer. The Volkswagen Polo’s biggest achilles heel is the features list which is basic at best. There is a 7-inch touchscreen, automatic climate control, and a music system.What is the best Polo to buy? We think the best Polo is a combination of the entry-level Life trim and the 1. TSI 95 engine. That keeps the price down but still gives you plenty of power and standard equipment.Polo is good with many things. However, the rear seat in the car is not so fun to sit in. The comfort is missing, and there is a lack of legroom in the back. The car has a huge floor hump in the middle, which is quite massive, creating issues for the rear-seat passenger(s).
Which model of Polo is the best?
What is the best Polo to buy? We think the best Polo is a combination of the entry-level Life trim and the 1. TSI 95 engine. That keeps the price down but still gives you plenty of power and standard equipment. For petrol, the 1. L TSI (from 2020 onwards) is the most modern and powerful, offering excellent performance. The 1. L TSI (older GT TSI) is also great but inspect its DSG gearbox carefully. For diesel, the 1. L TDI (especially the GT TDI tune) is highly regarded for its performance and fuel efficiency.VW Polo 1. L/1. L TDi Highline Diesel Manual Transmission, is the Best in class. However, Petrol 1. GT TSi, DSG Gear Box , Also is the Best in its Class.The 2. T TSI was a fairly reliable engine, but it does have a list of common problems. This article will outline the common VW engine problems and how to detect them. This engine uses direct injection to spray the fuel into the engine’s cylinders. The fuel injectors the piece that sprays the fuel.
Are 2009 polos reliable?
Overall, the Polo is seen as a pretty reliable choice, but buyers should be mindful of potential electrical issues and the associated repair costs. At high speeds, the vehicle maintains good stability without significant shaking or drifting. The power performance of the Polo is impressive. Its power system provides ample power output with smooth acceleration, making it suitable for both daily driving and high-speed travel.Even the 95hp version has enough oomph to get the Polo up to speed quickly and reasonably efficiently – expect to see about 50mpg in the real world. You’ll notice another 1. MPI engine has no turbocharger and it makes the Polo feel pretty sluggish above 50mph.Some common issues with the Polo have been highlighted in this article, including electric window problems, rear seatbelt issues, fuel system faults, fuel leaking, windscreen washer issues, airbag problems, rough idling and running poor and timing chain issues.Volkswagen Polo Vivo 1. TSI GT – 4. L/100km The VW Polo Vivo received an update in 2024 and the range-topping Polo Vivo GT is the most fuel-efficient derivative in the lineup with Volkswagen claiming an impressive 4. L/100km!
What is the mileage of 2009 Polo?
The Polo 2009-2014 mileage is 15. The Manual Petrol variant has a mileage of 17. The Automatic Petrol variant has a mileage of 17. The Manual Diesel variant has a mileage of 22. Which car has better mileage Swift or Polo? ARAI reported Maruti Suzuki Swift mileage is 24. Polo mileage is 16. Which car is better among Swift and Polo in styling, comfort and performance? Maruti Suzuki Swift ranks better in Comfort while Polo is better in Styling and Performance.
Is a VW Polo high risk?
Volkswagen Polo The Volkswagen Polo is another frequently hijacked vehicle. Its widespread use and easily sellable parts make it a prime target. The average Polo mileage at the time of repair requests is 60,487 miles. Most motors will run smoothly between the benchmark of 50,000 – 80,000 miles [2]. The Volkswagen Polo sits in the lower half of this scale, but it’s still well above the bottom of the benchmark, which suggests that the Polo is reasonably reliable.If you’re after a small car that feels upmarket, has plenty of back-seat space and won’t leave you wanting in the technology department, then the VW Polo is a really solid choice.Highlights of the Volkswagen Polo 2009 The Volkswagen Polo 2009 is a 5 seat Hatch with a 4-star ANCAP safety rating. It has a diesel or petrol engine with a fuel economy range from 5L/100km to 7. L/100km, depending on the model badge.What is Volkswagen Polo lifespan? The estimated lifespan of a Volkswagen Polo is 155,000 miles, before reaching the life expectancy upper limit. Factors such as ULEZ compliance and BHP are major when looking into a vehicle’s lifespan/life expectancy.
Are VW polos cheap to repair?
WhoCanFixMyCar found that when looking at the most common repair jobs, the Volkswagen Polo had the lowest average repair cost of £214. The Ford Fiesta is the second cheapest at £230. Vauxhall Corsa at £238. The average price of repair requests we’ve received for a Volkswagen Polo is £791, and the most expensive Polo repair request we’ve received is £8,834.If you do need to carry out maintenance, it’s reported that repairs are cheap, and parts are easy to come by. This makes the Polo an easy car to keep in great condition.Volkswagens are known for their European engineering, and with that reputation comes a slightly higher maintenance cost than the industry average. According to RepairPal, the average annual cost to maintain a Volkswagen is around $676, compared to the national average of $652.